Mavqi'im
How Mavqi'im voted in 2020
282 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 47.87% 135 votes |
+18.4 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 35.11% 99 votes |
+8.5 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 6.03% 17 votes |
+0.8 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 6.03% 17 votes |
−1.7 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 2.84% 8 votes |
−3.0 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 1.06% 3 votes |
−4.9 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.71% 2 votes |
−5.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.35% | 1 | −0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
284 voters out of 369 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Mavqi'im against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Poriyya-Newe Oved · Hosha'aya · Shetulim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Poriyya-Newe Oved | 705 |
| Hosha'aya | 1,041 |
| Shetulim | 1,066 |
| Shahar | 387 |
| Azarya | 640 |
| Gilat | 771 |
| Yad Rambam | 659 |
| Ora | 601 |
10 elections in Mavqi'im
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 390 | 296 | 75.9% | +5.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 370 | 266 | 71.9% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 369 | 284 | 77.0% | +5.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 372 | 274 | 73.7% | +3.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 368 | 276 | 75.0% | +6.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 297 | 233 | 78.5% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 284 | 187 | 65.8% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 239 | 158 | 66.1% | +3.6 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 106 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 136 | 109 | 80.1% | +14.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.