Mizpa
How Mizpa voted in 2019
94 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 56.38% 53 votes |
+30.4 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 21.28% 20 votes |
−3.8 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 9.57% 9 votes |
+4.8 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 5.32% 5 votes |
−1.7 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 5.32% 5 votes |
+1.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 1.06% | 1 | +0.7 |
| יז | אדום לבן - לגליזציה לקנביס, שוויון לאתיופים, ערבים ומקופחים | 1.06% | 1 | +1.0 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Mizpa voted for צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.06% here, 3.2 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.33%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
94 voters out of 136 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Mizpa against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet HaEmeq · Gazit · Geva
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet HaEmeq | 351 |
| Gazit | 455 |
| Geva | 380 |
| Eyal | 305 |
| Karmiyya | 320 |
| Sharona | 346 |
| En Yahav | 400 |
| Sha'ar HaGolan | 363 |
10 elections in Mizpa
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 113 | 85 | 75.2% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 118 | 85 | 72.0% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 130 | 92 | 70.8% | −0.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 136 | 94 | 69.1% | −0.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 132 | 103 | 78.0% | +9.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 127 | 101 | 79.5% | +7.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 136 | 105 | 77.2% | +9.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 135 | 91 | 67.4% | +4.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 77 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 112 | 87 | 77.7% | +12.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.