Newe Ur
How Newe Ur voted in 2003
178 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 53.93% 96 votes |
+39.5 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 21.35% 38 votes |
+16.1 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 14.04% 25 votes |
+1.8 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 5.06% 9 votes |
−24.3 |
| כן ישראל בעליה בראשות נתן שרנסקי | 0.56% 1 votes |
−1.6 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 0.56% 1 votes |
−2.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 3.37% | 6 | +2.2 |
| ט | מפלגת זכויות הגבר במשפחה - רעייש | 0.56% | 1 | +0.5 |
| רק | הירוקים | 0.56% | 1 | +0.2 |
What happened to these votes
6 people in Newe Ur voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.37% here, 2.8 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
179 voters out of 275 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Newe Ur against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet Alfa · Sha'ar HaAmaqim · Mizra
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet Alfa | 381 |
| Sha'ar HaAmaqim | 393 |
| Mizra | 465 |
| Yaqum | 350 |
| Elon | 355 |
| Amir | 348 |
| Hazor-Ashdod | 394 |
| Maggal | 321 |
10 elections in Newe Ur
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 345 | 229 | 66.4% | −4.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 345 | 233 | 67.5% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 342 | 241 | 70.5% | −1.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 340 | 234 | 68.8% | −1.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 338 | 231 | 68.3% | −0.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 323 | 218 | 67.5% | −4.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 301 | 213 | 70.8% | +3.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 315 | 211 | 67.0% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 181 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 275 | 179 | 65.1% | −0.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.