Nirim
How Nirim voted in 2020
262 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 43.89% 115 votes |
+17.3 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 40.46% 106 votes |
+34.6 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 8.02% 21 votes |
−21.4 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.44% 9 votes |
−2.3 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 1.91% 5 votes |
−10.8 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.76% 2 votes |
−6.9 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 0.38% 1 votes |
−4.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | קול הנשים | 0.38% | 1 | +0.3 |
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.38% | 1 | −0.0 |
| ףז | הפיראטים לדמוקרטיה לחצו כאן | 0.38% | 1 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
262 voters out of 379 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Nirim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet Nir · Nir Yizhaq · Huqoq
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet Nir | 343 |
| Nir Yizhaq | 360 |
| Huqoq | 302 |
| Yad Hanna | 457 |
| Yotvata | 436 |
| Midreshet Ben Gurion | 802 |
| Hadar Am | 412 |
| Giv'at Hayyim(Me'uhad) | 667 |
10 elections in Nirim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 416 | 292 | 70.2% | −0.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 380 | 266 | 70.0% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 379 | 262 | 69.1% | −2.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 378 | 277 | 73.3% | +3.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 384 | 284 | 74.0% | +5.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 377 | 280 | 74.3% | +1.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 379 | 269 | 71.0% | +3.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 363 | 255 | 70.2% | +7.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 242 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 355 | 256 | 72.1% | +6.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.