Meron
How Meron voted in 2009
232 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 28.88% 67 votes |
+26.0 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 26.72% 62 votes |
+23.4 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 15.52% 36 votes |
−6.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 11.21% 26 votes |
+2.7 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 9.48% 22 votes |
+5.1 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 4.74% 11 votes |
−7.0 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 2.16% 5 votes |
−20.3 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 0.43% 1 votes |
−9.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 0.43% | 1 | −0.4 |
| זך | גיל – גימלאי ישראל לכנסת | 0.43% | 1 | −0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
235 voters out of 359 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Meron against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ahi'ezer · Mizpe Yeriho · Shave Shomeron
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ahi'ezer | 676 |
| Mizpe Yeriho | 716 |
| Shave Shomeron | 359 |
| Bet Horon | 487 |
| Neve Tsuf | 543 |
| Ma'ale Mikhmas | 511 |
| Noqedim | 375 |
| Dalton | 344 |
10 elections in Meron
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 526 | 327 | 62.2% | −8.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 495 | 282 | 57.0% | −10.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 453 | 297 | 65.6% | −6.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 443 | 261 | 58.9% | −10.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 443 | 298 | 67.3% | −1.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 405 | 264 | 65.2% | −7.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 394 | 266 | 67.5% | −0.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 359 | 235 | 65.5% | +3.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 221 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 327 | 249 | 76.1% | +10.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.