Shomera
How Shomera voted in 2003
169 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 46.15% 78 votes |
+16.8 |
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 14.20% 24 votes |
+6.0 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 13.02% 22 votes |
−1.4 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 13.02% 22 votes |
+10.3 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 4.73% 8 votes |
+0.4 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 2.96% 5 votes |
−9.3 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 2.37% 4 votes |
−1.8 |
| כן ישראל בעליה בראשות נתן שרנסקי | 1.78% 3 votes |
−0.4 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 0.59% 1 votes |
−4.9 |
| עם הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת | 0.59% 1 votes |
−1.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | חרות | 0.59% | 1 | −0.6 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
172 voters out of 237 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Shomera against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ahi'ezer · Bene Re'em · Porat
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ahi'ezer | 625 |
| Bene Re'em | 426 |
| Porat | 394 |
| Elyaqim | 326 |
| Teqoa | 470 |
| Tifrah | 579 |
| Sede Uzziyyahu | 447 |
| Alma | 358 |
10 elections in Shomera
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 310 | 203 | 65.5% | −5.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 307 | 193 | 62.9% | −4.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 303 | 203 | 67.0% | −4.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 301 | 201 | 66.8% | −3.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 299 | 198 | 66.2% | −2.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 282 | 201 | 71.3% | −1.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 278 | 166 | 59.7% | −8.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 261 | 177 | 67.8% | +5.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 163 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 237 | 172 | 72.6% | +7.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.