En HaShelosha
How En HaShelosha voted in 2019
179 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 56.98% 102 votes |
+31.0 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 17.88% 32 votes |
+13.1 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 8.38% 15 votes |
+1.4 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 8.38% 15 votes |
−16.7 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 4.47% 8 votes |
+0.1 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 1.68% 3 votes |
−4.2 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"ם, תע"ל, בל"ד | 1.12% 2 votes |
−9.5 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.56% 1 votes |
−6.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | מתקדמת | 0.56% | 1 | +0.5 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
180 voters out of 292 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
En HaShelosha against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Merom Golan · Ramat HaKovesh · En HaHoresh
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Merom Golan | 409 |
| Ramat HaKovesh | 526 |
| En HaHoresh | 555 |
| Kefar HaNasi | 401 |
| En Hod | 357 |
| Harduf | 313 |
| Ya'ad | 405 |
| Kefar Hayyim | 331 |
10 elections in En HaShelosha
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 299 | 175 | 58.5% | −12.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 313 | 190 | 60.7% | −6.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 311 | 187 | 60.1% | −11.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 292 | 180 | 61.6% | −8.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 305 | 186 | 61.0% | −7.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 336 | 224 | 66.7% | −5.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 329 | 197 | 59.9% | −7.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 304 | 187 | 61.5% | −1.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 181 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 290 | 179 | 61.7% | −3.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.