Hodiyya
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as הודיה
How Hodiyya voted in 2009
274 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 40.88% 112 votes |
+19.3 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 17.15% 47 votes |
−5.3 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 11.31% 31 votes |
+1.4 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 9.49% 26 votes |
+1.0 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 8.03% 22 votes |
−3.7 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 5.47% 15 votes |
+2.1 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 1.82% 5 votes |
−1.1 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 1.46% 4 votes |
−1.4 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 0.73% 2 votes |
−3.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 7 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זך | גיל – גימלאי ישראל לכנסת | 0.73% | 2 | +0.2 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.73% | 2 | +0.3 |
| רק | הירוקים – למען ישראל ירוקה | 0.73% | 2 | +0.4 |
| חי | ישראל חזקה בראשות ד"ר אפרים סנה | 0.36% | 1 | +0.2 |
| ים | הישראלים | 0.36% | 1 | +0.3 |
| פ | כח להשפיע | 0.36% | 1 | +0.3 |
| צי | צבר – מפלגת הצעירים של ישראל | 0.36% | 1 | +0.2 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
276 voters out of 466 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Hodiyya against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Pattish · Qiryat Ye'arim · Bitha
10 elections in Hodiyya
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 535 | 365 | 68.2% | −2.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 522 | 342 | 65.5% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 498 | 322 | 64.7% | −6.9 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 496 | 331 | 66.7% | −3.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 496 | 337 | 67.9% | −0.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 474 | 325 | 68.6% | −3.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 485 | 278 | 57.3% | −10.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 466 | 276 | 59.2% | −3.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 260 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 472 | 278 | 58.9% | −6.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.