Dor
How Dor voted in 2015
219 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 42.92% 94 votes |
+24.2 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 18.72% 41 votes |
−4.7 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 13.70% 30 votes |
+4.9 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 12.79% 28 votes |
+5.3 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 5.02% 11 votes |
+1.1 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 4.57% 10 votes |
−2.2 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, רע"מ, בל"ד, תע"ל) | 0.46% 1 votes |
−10.1 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.46% 1 votes |
−4.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 0.91% | 2 | −0.2 |
| זץ | Unsourced | 0.46% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
220 voters out of 266 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Dor against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Sal'it · Kefar Monash · Kefar Yedidya
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Sal'it | 317 |
| Kefar Monash | 488 |
| Kefar Yedidya | 398 |
| Bahan | 418 |
| Kefar Szold | 333 |
| Yas'ur | 311 |
| Shamir | 472 |
| Mishmarot | 365 |
10 elections in Dor
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 286 | 214 | 74.8% | +4.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 287 | 223 | 77.7% | +10.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 285 | 222 | 77.9% | +6.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 276 | 225 | 81.5% | +11.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 276 | 221 | 80.1% | +11.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 266 | 220 | 82.7% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 267 | 196 | 73.4% | +5.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 270 | 201 | 74.4% | +11.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 159 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 204 | 129 | 63.2% | −2.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.