Sede Uzziyyahu
How Sede Uzziyyahu voted in 2022
849 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 54.42% 462 votes |
+31.0 |
| שס Shas | 16.61% 141 votes |
+8.4 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 15.19% 129 votes |
+4.4 |
| כן National Unity | 6.48% 55 votes |
−2.6 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 2.94% 25 votes |
−14.8 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 2.36% 20 votes |
−3.5 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 0.82% 7 votes |
−2.9 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 0.12% 1 votes |
−4.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 5 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 0.35% | 3 | −0.8 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.24% | 2 | −0.1 |
| צ | צעירים בוערים בהנהגת הדר מוכתר | 0.24% | 2 | +0.1 |
| יץ | צו השעה | 0.12% | 1 | +0.1 |
| נר | "אנחנו" - בראשות עו"ד מוש חוג`ה | 0.12% | 1 | +0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
851 voters out of 1,026 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Sede Uzziyyahu against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ganne Modi'in · Suseya · Kefar Zetim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ganne Modi'in | 1,532 |
| Suseya | 596 |
| Kefar Zetim | 351 |
| Menuha | 366 |
| Nizzan B | 333 |
| Kefar Pines | 312 |
| Bareqet | 1,011 |
| Rewaha | 360 |
10 elections in Sede Uzziyyahu
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 1,026 | 851 | 82.9% | +12.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 1,009 | 759 | 75.2% | +7.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 990 | 798 | 80.6% | +9.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 979 | 817 | 83.5% | +13.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 970 | 759 | 78.2% | +9.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 884 | 704 | 79.6% | +7.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 841 | 602 | 71.6% | +3.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 752 | 501 | 66.6% | +4.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 394 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 650 | 455 | 70.0% | +4.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.