Goren
How Goren voted in 2015
260 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 45.38% 118 votes |
+22.0 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 20.38% 53 votes |
+14.6 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 11.54% 30 votes |
+4.0 |
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 10.77% 28 votes |
−7.9 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 4.62% 12 votes |
−2.1 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 3.08% 8 votes |
−5.7 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 2.31% 6 votes |
−2.7 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.38% 1 votes |
−4.7 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 0.38% 1 votes |
−3.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קץ | יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי | 0.77% | 2 | −2.2 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 0.38% | 1 | −0.7 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
264 voters out of 351 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Goren against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Beqoa · Bet Shiqma · Zelafon
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Beqoa | 354 |
| Bet Shiqma | 345 |
| Zelafon | 430 |
| Zekharya | 554 |
| Lavi | 386 |
| Zetan | 654 |
| Ale Zahav | 530 |
| Kefar HaRo'e | 599 |
10 elections in Goren
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 344 | 266 | 77.3% | +6.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 331 | 242 | 73.1% | +5.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 342 | 267 | 78.1% | +6.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 344 | 252 | 73.3% | +3.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 348 | 256 | 73.6% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 351 | 264 | 75.2% | +2.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 352 | 250 | 71.0% | +3.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 339 | 241 | 71.1% | +8.6 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 242 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 319 | 218 | 68.3% | +2.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.