Zuri'el
How Zuri'el voted in 2009
157 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 33.76% 53 votes |
+12.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 21.66% 34 votes |
+13.2 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 18.47% 29 votes |
+8.5 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 10.83% 17 votes |
−11.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 8.92% 14 votes |
−2.8 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 2.55% 4 votes |
−0.3 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 1.27% 2 votes |
−3.1 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 1.27% 2 votes |
−1.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 0.64% | 1 | −0.2 |
| רק | הירוקים – למען ישראל ירוקה | 0.64% | 1 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
158 voters out of 239 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Zuri'el against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet Arif · Liman · Newe Yamin
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet Arif | 388 |
| Liman | 335 |
| Newe Yamin | 599 |
| Sede Eli'ezer | 324 |
| Menahemya | 522 |
| Yinnon | 420 |
| Mazliah | 540 |
| Kefar Truman | 400 |
10 elections in Zuri'el
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 330 | 224 | 67.9% | −2.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 305 | 216 | 70.8% | +3.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 294 | 216 | 73.5% | +2.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 288 | 213 | 74.0% | +4.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 285 | 214 | 75.1% | +6.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 256 | 199 | 77.7% | +5.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 244 | 171 | 70.1% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 239 | 158 | 66.1% | +3.6 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 144 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 214 | 158 | 73.8% | +8.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.