Qiryat Anavim
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as קרית ענבים
How Qiryat Anavim voted in 2020
205 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 51.22% 105 votes |
+24.6 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 32.20% 66 votes |
+26.4 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 10.24% 21 votes |
−19.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.93% 6 votes |
−2.8 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 1.46% 3 votes |
−11.2 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.98% 2 votes |
−6.7 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 0.49% 1 votes |
−4.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | קול הנשים | 0.49% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
205 voters out of 305 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Qiryat Anavim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar HaNasi · Gal'on · En Gedi
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar HaNasi | 371 |
| Gal'on | 326 |
| En Gedi | 313 |
| Atsmon Segev | 663 |
| Sarigim (Li-On) | 566 |
| Barqay | 333 |
| En HaHoresh | 543 |
| Ramat HaKovesh | 532 |
10 elections in Qiryat Anavim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 333 | 206 | 61.9% | −8.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 328 | 211 | 64.3% | −3.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 305 | 205 | 67.2% | −4.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 306 | 209 | 68.3% | −1.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 304 | 220 | 72.4% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 293 | 229 | 78.2% | +5.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 275 | 210 | 76.4% | +8.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 278 | 208 | 74.8% | +12.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 206 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 267 | 198 | 74.2% | +8.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.