Agur
How Agur voted in 2020
242 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 66.12% 160 votes |
+36.7 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 14.46% 35 votes |
+6.8 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 7.02% 17 votes |
−19.6 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 5.79% 14 votes |
−0.2 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 4.13% 10 votes |
−1.7 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 0.83% 2 votes |
−4.4 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.41% 1 votes |
−12.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.41% 1 votes |
−5.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.83% | 2 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
242 voters out of 302 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Agur against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Sa'ad · Newe Mikha'el · Migdal
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Sa'ad | 450 |
| Newe Mikha'el | 379 |
| Migdal | 934 |
| Naham | 332 |
| Hadid | 486 |
| Bet Arif | 580 |
| Kefar Ya'bez | 376 |
| Avne Etan | 311 |
10 elections in Agur
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 327 | 247 | 75.5% | +4.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 316 | 233 | 73.7% | +6.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 302 | 242 | 80.1% | +8.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 298 | 234 | 78.5% | +8.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 303 | 224 | 73.9% | +5.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 286 | 208 | 72.7% | +0.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 270 | 193 | 71.5% | +3.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 250 | 176 | 70.4% | +7.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 164 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 237 | 178 | 75.1% | +9.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.