Yoshivya
How Yoshivya voted in 2019
258 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 44.96% 116 votes |
+18.5 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 25.58% 66 votes |
+19.6 |
| טב איחוד מפלגות הימין הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי- עוצמה יהודית | 8.53% 22 votes |
+4.8 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 4.26% 11 votes |
−1.5 |
| כ כולנו הימין השפוי בראשות משה כחלון | 2.33% 6 votes |
−1.2 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 2.33% 6 votes |
−23.8 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות אבי גבאי | 0.78% 2 votes |
−3.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | הימין החדש בראשות שקד ובנט | 6.98% | 18 | +3.8 |
| ז | זהות - תנועה ישראלית יהודית בהנהגת משה פייגלין | 2.33% | 6 | −0.4 |
| נר | גשר בראשות אורלי לוי אבקסיס | 1.55% | 4 | −0.2 |
| ףי | פשוט אהבה - כי כולן/ם בני אדם | 0.39% | 1 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
18 people in Yoshivya voted for הימין החדש בראשות שקד ובנט. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 6.98% here, 2.2 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.22%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
259 voters out of 329 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Yoshivya against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Yoshivya
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 377 | 310 | 82.2% | +11.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 354 | 270 | 76.3% | +8.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 337 | 272 | 80.7% | +9.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 334 | 265 | 79.3% | +9.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 329 | 259 | 78.7% | +10.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 276 | 240 | 87.0% | +14.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 235 | 193 | 82.1% | +14.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 202 | 146 | 72.3% | +9.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 144 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 194 | 153 | 78.9% | +13.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.