Uza
How Uza voted in 2021
260 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 42.31% 110 votes |
+18.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 29.23% 76 votes |
+22.1 |
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 16.92% 44 votes |
+11.8 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 3.85% 10 votes |
−2.4 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 2.31% 6 votes |
−3.3 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 2.31% 6 votes |
−4.3 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 1.15% 3 votes |
−3.6 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 0.77% 2 votes |
−13.2 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 0.38% 1 votes |
−5.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.38% | 1 | −0.4 |
| רנ | התקווה לשינוי | 0.38% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
260 voters out of 362 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Uza against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Nizzan B · Zavdi'el · Kefar Tappuah
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Nizzan B | 340 |
| Zavdi'el | 354 |
| Kefar Tappuah | 502 |
| Ozem | 350 |
| Nir Gallim | 547 |
| Zimrat | 332 |
| Bareqet | 895 |
| Ahi'ezer | 1,005 |
10 elections in Uza
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 342 | 267 | 78.1% | +7.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 362 | 260 | 71.8% | +4.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 366 | 289 | 79.0% | +7.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 367 | 284 | 77.4% | +7.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 362 | 273 | 75.4% | +7.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 374 | 294 | 78.6% | +6.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 374 | 268 | 71.7% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 396 | 247 | 62.4% | −0.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 239 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 415 | 300 | 72.3% | +6.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.