Mivtahim
How Mivtahim voted in 2022
266 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 39.10% 104 votes |
+15.7 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 31.95% 85 votes |
+21.1 |
| שס Shas | 9.02% 24 votes |
+0.8 |
| כן National Unity | 7.52% 20 votes |
−1.6 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 7.52% 20 votes |
−10.3 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 1.50% 4 votes |
−2.2 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 1.50% 4 votes |
−4.4 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 0.38% 1 votes |
−4.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.75% | 2 | +0.5 |
| אצ | חופש כלכלי בראשות אביר קארה | 0.38% | 1 | +0.0 |
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 0.38% | 1 | −0.8 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
267 voters out of 399 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Mivtahim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Porat · Bet HaGaddi · Berekhya
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Porat | 681 |
| Bet HaGaddi | 491 |
| Berekhya | 693 |
| Biriyya | 455 |
| Revava | 1,195 |
| Pedu'el | 974 |
| Nizzan B | 333 |
| Be'er Gannim | 974 |
10 elections in Mivtahim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 399 | 267 | 66.9% | −3.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 397 | 239 | 60.2% | −7.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 389 | 240 | 61.7% | −9.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 385 | 247 | 64.2% | −5.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 385 | 234 | 60.8% | −7.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 367 | 230 | 62.7% | −9.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 360 | 220 | 61.1% | −6.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 344 | 200 | 58.1% | −4.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 165 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 302 | 183 | 60.6% | −5.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.