Mivtahim
How Mivtahim voted in 2009
199 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 34.17% 68 votes |
+24.2 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 19.60% 39 votes |
−2.0 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 18.09% 36 votes |
+6.4 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 13.07% 26 votes |
−9.4 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 11.06% 22 votes |
+2.6 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 1.51% 3 votes |
−1.4 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 1.01% 2 votes |
−1.9 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 1.01% 2 votes |
−2.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יק | ניצולי השואה עם בוגרי עלה ירוק | 0.50% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
200 voters out of 344 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Mivtahim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ahituv · Petahya · Newe Yamin
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ahituv | 402 |
| Petahya | 391 |
| Newe Yamin | 599 |
| Mazliah | 540 |
| Giv'ati | 356 |
| En Sarid | 592 |
| Giv'at Avni | 986 |
| Sede Eli'ezer | 324 |
10 elections in Mivtahim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 399 | 267 | 66.9% | −3.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 397 | 239 | 60.2% | −7.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 389 | 240 | 61.7% | −9.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 385 | 247 | 64.2% | −5.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 385 | 234 | 60.8% | −7.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 367 | 230 | 62.7% | −9.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 360 | 220 | 61.1% | −6.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 344 | 200 | 58.1% | −4.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 165 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 302 | 183 | 60.6% | −5.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.