Gannot
How Gannot voted in 2009
243 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 44.44% 108 votes |
+22.0 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 28.81% 70 votes |
+7.2 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 12.35% 30 votes |
+2.4 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 5.76% 14 votes |
+2.8 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.88% 7 votes |
−8.8 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 1.65% 4 votes |
−6.8 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 1.23% 3 votes |
−3.2 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 0.82% 2 votes |
−2.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 0.82% | 2 | +0.0 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.82% | 2 | +0.4 |
| יק | ניצולי השואה עם בוגרי עלה ירוק | 0.41% | 1 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
244 voters out of 333 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Gannot against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ora · Mesillat Ziyyon · Bet El'azari
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ora | 442 |
| Mesillat Ziyyon | 401 |
| Bet El'azari | 643 |
| Gan Ner | 1,080 |
| Ahuzzat Baraq | 678 |
| Menahemya | 522 |
| Yoqne'am(Moshava) | 675 |
| Neta'im | 301 |
10 elections in Gannot
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 345 | 271 | 78.6% | +7.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 354 | 268 | 75.7% | +8.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 351 | 269 | 76.6% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 342 | 267 | 78.1% | +8.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 348 | 267 | 76.7% | +8.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 347 | 286 | 82.4% | +10.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 364 | 295 | 81.0% | +13.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 333 | 244 | 73.3% | +10.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 227 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 274 | 213 | 77.7% | +12.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.