Rehov
How Rehov voted in 2013
179 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 40.78% 73 votes |
+17.4 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 29.61% 53 votes |
+20.9 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט - מיסודם של האיחוד הלאומי, המפד"ל החדשה | 10.61% 19 votes |
+1.5 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 7.82% 14 votes |
−6.5 |
| כן הישראלים | 3.91% 7 votes |
+1.8 |
| צפ התנועה בראשות ציפי לבני | 3.35% 6 votes |
−1.6 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות שלי יחימוביץ' | 1.12% 2 votes |
−10.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ץ | עם שלם - בהכוונת הרב חיים אמסלם | 1.12% | 2 | −0.1 |
| הפ | חיים בכבוד | 0.56% | 1 | +0.5 |
| נץ | עוצמה לישראל בראשות אריה אלדד ומיכאל בן-ארי | 0.56% | 1 | −1.2 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - הרשימה הליברלית | 0.56% | 1 | −0.6 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Rehov voted for עם שלם - בהכוונת הרב חיים אמסלם. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.12% here, 0.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
181 voters out of 269 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Rehov against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Rehov
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 336 | 248 | 73.8% | +3.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 330 | 235 | 71.2% | +3.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 328 | 246 | 75.0% | +3.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 324 | 233 | 71.9% | +2.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 322 | 235 | 73.0% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 283 | 221 | 78.1% | +5.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 269 | 181 | 67.3% | −0.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 251 | 172 | 68.5% | +6.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 134 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 229 | 150 | 65.5% | −0.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.