Kesalon
How Kesalon voted in 2020
213 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 60.56% 129 votes |
+31.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 20.66% 44 votes |
+13.0 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 7.51% 16 votes |
−19.1 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 5.16% 11 votes |
−0.7 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 2.82% 6 votes |
−2.4 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.41% 3 votes |
−4.3 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.47% 1 votes |
−5.5 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.47% 1 votes |
−12.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | עוצמה ליברלית – כלכלית בראשות גלעד אלפר | 0.47% | 1 | +0.4 |
| ףז | הפיראטים לדמוקרטיה לחצו כאן | 0.47% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
213 voters out of 277 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kesalon against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet Hananya · Kefar Yehezqel · Ramot HaShavim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet Hananya | 461 |
| Kefar Yehezqel | 593 |
| Ramot HaShavim | 889 |
| Talme El'azar | 518 |
| Mazzuva | 575 |
| Dorot | 408 |
| Nir Zevi | 672 |
| Shoresh | 848 |
10 elections in Kesalon
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 303 | 225 | 74.3% | +3.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 289 | 207 | 71.6% | +4.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 277 | 213 | 76.9% | +5.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 278 | 198 | 71.2% | +1.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 274 | 212 | 77.4% | +8.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 277 | 215 | 77.6% | +5.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 258 | 183 | 70.9% | +3.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 230 | 154 | 67.0% | +4.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 128 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 194 | 145 | 74.7% | +9.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.