Allone Yizhaq
How Allone Yizhaq voted in 2021
23 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 26.09% 6 votes |
+12.2 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 26.09% 6 votes |
+21.3 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 21.74% 5 votes |
+15.6 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 13.04% 3 votes |
+6.4 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 4.35% 1 votes |
−1.9 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 4.35% 1 votes |
−19.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 4.35% | 1 | +3.6 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Allone Yizhaq voted for הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.35% here, 5.5 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.79%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
23 voters out of 125 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Allone Yizhaq against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Kisch · Giv'at Yo'av · Balfurya
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 15 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Kisch | 332 |
| Giv'at Yo'av | 341 |
| Balfurya | 331 |
| En Iron | 328 |
| Sharona | 337 |
| En HaNaziv | 309 |
| Yad Natan | 313 |
| Gevim | 339 |
10 elections in Allone Yizhaq
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 125 | 24 | 19.2% | −51.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 125 | 23 | 18.4% | −49.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 120 | 23 | 19.2% | −52.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 127 | 28 | 22.0% | −47.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 114 | 24 | 21.1% | −47.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 119 | 27 | 22.7% | −49.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 115 | 28 | 24.3% | −43.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 116 | 22 | 19.0% | −43.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 22 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 123 | 27 | 22.0% | −43.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.