Sede Boqer
How Sede Boqer voted in 2019
270 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 49.63% 134 votes |
+23.7 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 25.19% 68 votes |
+20.4 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 16.67% 45 votes |
+12.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.59% 7 votes |
−4.4 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 2.22% 6 votes |
−22.9 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 1.85% 5 votes |
−4.0 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"ם, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.37% 1 votes |
−10.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | אדום לבן - לגליזציה לקנביס, שוויון לאתיופים, ערבים ומקופחים | 0.74% | 2 | +0.6 |
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 0.37% | 1 | +0.0 |
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.37% | 1 | −1.5 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
270 voters out of 408 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Sede Boqer against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Karmiyya | 320 |
| Hanni'el | 486 |
| Na'an | 980 |
| Sha'ar HaGolan | 363 |
| En Yahav | 400 |
| Allon HaGalil | 641 |
| Ramot Menashe | 627 |
| Rishpon | 679 |
10 elections in Sede Boqer
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 428 | 266 | 62.1% | −8.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 422 | 281 | 66.6% | −0.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 415 | 279 | 67.2% | −4.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 408 | 270 | 66.2% | −3.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 408 | 286 | 70.1% | +1.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 395 | 262 | 66.3% | −6.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 435 | 302 | 69.4% | +1.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 408 | 276 | 67.6% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 290 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 362 | 245 | 67.7% | +2.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.