Kefar Hasidim Bet
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as כפר חסידים ב
How Kefar Hasidim Bet voted in 2020
154 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 42.21% 65 votes |
+12.7 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 27.92% 43 votes |
+1.3 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 21.43% 33 votes |
+16.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.60% 4 votes |
−3.1 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 1.95% 3 votes |
−4.0 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 1.95% 3 votes |
−5.7 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 1.30% 2 votes |
−4.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.65% | 1 | +0.2 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
155 voters out of 204 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kefar Hasidim Bet against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Hasidim Alef · Sede Ya'aqov · Giv'at Koah
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Hasidim Alef | 389 |
| Sede Ya'aqov | 501 |
| Giv'at Koah | 481 |
| Menahemya | 600 |
| Maslul | 371 |
| Kefar Ezyon | 367 |
| Tene | 384 |
| Lavi | 380 |
10 elections in Kefar Hasidim Bet
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 226 | 158 | 69.9% | −0.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 219 | 159 | 72.6% | +5.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 204 | 155 | 76.0% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 215 | 161 | 74.9% | +5.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 219 | 162 | 74.0% | +5.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 277 | 201 | 72.6% | +0.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 124 | 92 | 74.2% | +6.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 125 | 92 | 73.6% | +11.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 88 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 119 | 91 | 76.5% | +10.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.