Hefzi-Bah
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as חפציבה
How Hefzi-Bah voted in 2020
413 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 55.21% 228 votes |
+28.6 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 20.58% 85 votes |
+14.8 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 18.16% 75 votes |
−11.3 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 3.15% 13 votes |
−2.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 1.45% 6 votes |
−6.2 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.73% 3 votes |
−11.9 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.24% 1 votes |
−5.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | קול הנשים | 0.24% | 1 | +0.2 |
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.24% | 1 | −0.2 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
417 voters out of 569 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Hefzi-Bah against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Amirim | 407 |
| HaYogev | 435 |
| Burgeta | 617 |
| Shadmot Devora | 383 |
| Ginnosar | 370 |
| Sede Warburg | 732 |
| Metula | 862 |
| Giv'at HaShelosha | 386 |
10 elections in Hefzi-Bah
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 587 | 411 | 70.0% | −0.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 564 | 412 | 73.0% | +5.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 569 | 417 | 73.3% | +1.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 566 | 432 | 76.3% | +6.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 566 | 420 | 74.2% | +5.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 416 | 306 | 73.6% | +1.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 408 | 296 | 72.5% | +4.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 381 | 259 | 68.0% | +5.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 262 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 376 | 269 | 71.5% | +5.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.