Al-'Ukbi
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as עוקבי (בנו עוקבה) · עוקבי )בנו עוקבה( · עוקבי בנו עוקבה
How Al-'Ukbi voted in 2022
174 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| עם Ra'am | 66.67% 116 votes |
+62.6 |
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 10.34% 18 votes |
+6.6 |
| מחל Likud | 0.57% 1 votes |
−22.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ד | בל"ד - אלתג`מוע אלווטני אלדמוקרטי בראשות סמי אבו ש | 20.69% | 36 | +17.8 |
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 1.72% | 3 | −1.4 |
What happened to these votes
36 people in Al-'Ukbi voted for בל"ד - אלתג`מוע אלווטני אלדמוקרטי בראשות סמי אבו ש. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 20.69% here, 7.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 2.91%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
175 voters out of 353 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Al-'Ukbi against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Sandala · Meiser · Kudayrat as-Sani'
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Sandala | 476 |
| Meiser | 593 |
| Kudayrat as-Sani' | 340 |
| Abu Tulul | 647 |
| Al-Hawashila | 624 |
| Sayyid | 321 |
| Rummane | 614 |
| Hussniyya | 321 |
10 elections in Al-'Ukbi
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 353 | 175 | 49.6% | −21.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 327 | 128 | 39.1% | −28.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 292 | 174 | 59.6% | −11.9 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 283 | 143 | 50.5% | −19.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 276 | 121 | 43.8% | −24.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 234 | 164 | 70.1% | −2.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 209 | 134 | 64.1% | −3.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 175 | 58 | 33.1% | −29.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 110 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 199 | 103 | 51.8% | −13.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.