Asad
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as אסד )שבט( · אסד שבט
How Asad voted in 2015
66 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, רע"מ, בל"ד, תע"ל) | 80.30% 53 votes |
+69.7 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 6.06% 4 votes |
−17.3 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 3.03% 2 votes |
−0.9 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 3.03% 2 votes |
−5.8 |
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 1.52% 1 votes |
−17.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ע | הרשימה הערבית | 4.55% | 3 | +4.4 |
| ף | הפיראטים - הפתק הלבן | 1.52% | 1 | +1.5 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Asad voted for הרשימה הערבית. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.55% here, 44.5 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.10%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
67 voters out of 420 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Asad against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Abu Juway'ad · Kawa'in · Al-Huzayyil
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Abu Juway'ad | 306 |
| Kawa'in | 309 |
| Al-Huzayyil | 308 |
| Barqay | 327 |
| Lotem | 316 |
| Nahshon | 304 |
| Netiv HaLamed-He | 321 |
| Hefzi-Bah | 303 |
10 elections in Asad
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 539 | 133 | 24.7% | −45.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 511 | 83 | 16.2% | −51.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 493 | 131 | 26.6% | −44.9 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 488 | 108 | 22.1% | −47.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 488 | 50 | 10.2% | −58.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 420 | 67 | 16.0% | −56.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 381 | 85 | 22.3% | −45.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 289 | 33 | 11.4% | −51.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 102 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 464 | 117 | 25.2% | −40.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.