Kudayrat as-Sani'
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as קודייראת א-צאנע(ש · קודייראת א-צאנע(שבט) · קודייראת א-צאנע)ש · קודייראת אצאנעשבט
How Kudayrat as-Sani' voted in 2020
381 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 95.01% 362 votes |
+82.3 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 2.10% 8 votes |
−24.5 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 1.31% 5 votes |
−4.5 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.26% 1 votes |
−7.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 5 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יר | מנהיגות חברתית | 0.26% | 1 | +0.3 |
| נ | קול הנשים | 0.26% | 1 | +0.2 |
| נק | מתקדמת (בשיתוף עם תנועת הדרור העברי) | 0.26% | 1 | +0.2 |
| ץ | דעם כלכלה ירוקה מדינה אחת | 0.26% | 1 | +0.2 |
| קך | סדר חדש לשינוי שיטת הבחירות בראשות עו"ד אביטל אופק | 0.26% | 1 | +0.2 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
385 voters out of 1,350 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Kudayrat as-Sani' against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Al-Hawashila · Uzeir · Sandala
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Al-Hawashila | 578 |
| Uzeir | 1,279 |
| Sandala | 739 |
| Derig'at | 423 |
| Bir Hadage | 921 |
| Rummane | 581 |
| Muqeible | 1,552 |
| Kafar Bara | 1,787 |
10 elections in Kudayrat as-Sani'
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 1,512 | 345 | 22.8% | −47.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 1,422 | 293 | 20.6% | −46.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 1,350 | 385 | 28.5% | −43.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 1,333 | 406 | 30.5% | −39.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 1,306 | 168 | 12.9% | −55.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 1,108 | 386 | 34.8% | −37.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 1,014 | 306 | 30.2% | −37.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 931 | 192 | 20.6% | −41.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 425 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 942 | 324 | 34.4% | −31.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.