Al-'Atawina
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as עטאוונה )שבט( · עטאוונה שבט
How Al-'Atawina voted in 2019
5 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 40.00% 2 votes |
+35.5 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 40.00% 2 votes |
+13.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | הימין החדש בראשות שקד ובנט | 20.00% | 1 | +16.8 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Al-'Atawina voted for הימין החדש בראשות שקד ובנט. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 20.00% here, 6.2 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.22%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
5 voters out of 111 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Al-'Atawina against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ghajar · Rumat Heib · Beit Jann
The nearest localities on the map. This locality has no others of a similar size, so the comparison is not limited by size.
| Ghajar | 599 |
| Rumat Heib | 520 |
| Beit Jann | 4,897 |
| Peqi'in (Buqei'a) | 2,519 |
| Daliyat Al-Karmel | 7,404 |
| Isifya | 4,472 |
| Zarzir | 1,859 |
| Ein Naqquba | 675 |
10 elections in Al-'Atawina
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 116 | 34 | 29.3% | −41.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 113 | 14 | 12.4% | −55.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 110 | 31 | 28.2% | −43.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 112 | 44 | 39.3% | −30.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 111 | 5 | 4.5% | −64.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 119 | 57 | 47.9% | −24.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 124 | 29 | 23.4% | −44.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 109 | 8 | 7.3% | −55.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 72 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 251 | 91 | 36.3% | −29.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.