Tarabin as-Sani'
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as תראבין א-צאנע (שב · תראבין א-צאנע )שב · תראבין אצאנע שבט
How Tarabin as-Sani' voted in 2022
72 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| עם Ra'am | 58.33% 42 votes |
+54.3 |
| מחל Likud | 38.89% 28 votes |
+15.5 |
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 1.39% 1 votes |
−2.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 1.39% | 1 | −1.8 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Tarabin as-Sani' voted for מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.39% here, 0.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.16%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
74 voters out of 582 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Tarabin as-Sani' against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Abu Qureinat · Sayyid · Kabbu'a
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Abu Qureinat | 346 |
| Sayyid | 321 |
| Kabbu'a | 340 |
| Hussniyya | 321 |
| Arab Al Naim | 333 |
| Kudayrat as-Sani' | 340 |
| Majdal Shams | 312 |
| Nahshon | 351 |
10 elections in Tarabin as-Sani'
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 582 | 74 | 12.7% | −57.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 546 | 57 | 10.4% | −57.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 520 | 48 | 9.2% | −62.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 511 | 33 | 6.5% | −63.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 496 | 26 | 5.2% | −63.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 639 | 106 | 16.6% | −55.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 584 | 98 | 16.8% | −51.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 628 | 35 | 5.6% | −56.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 74 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 469 | 53 | 11.3% | −54.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.