Tarabin as-Sani'
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as תראבין א-צאנע (שב · תראבין א-צאנע )שב · תראבין אצאנע שבט
How Tarabin as-Sani' voted in 2009
33 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| עם הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת - התנועה הערבית להתחדשות | 87.88% 29 votes |
+84.5 |
| ד אלתג'מוע אלוטני אלדמוקרטי – בל"ד | 3.03% 1 votes |
+0.5 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 3.03% 1 votes |
−18.6 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 3.03% 1 votes |
+0.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ים | הישראלים | 3.03% | 1 | +3.0 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Tarabin as-Sani' voted for הישראלים. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.03% here, 119.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.03%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
35 voters out of 628 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Tarabin as-Sani' against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kamane · Hamam · Abu Juway'ad
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 15 times the number of valid votes).
| Kamane | 389 |
| Hamam | 325 |
| Abu Juway'ad | 396 |
| Meiser | 349 |
| Abu Rubay'a | 475 |
| Ein Naqquba | 385 |
| Al-Hawashila | 351 |
| Uzeir | 448 |
10 elections in Tarabin as-Sani'
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 582 | 74 | 12.7% | −57.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 546 | 57 | 10.4% | −57.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 520 | 48 | 9.2% | −62.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 511 | 33 | 6.5% | −63.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 496 | 26 | 5.2% | −63.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 639 | 106 | 16.6% | −55.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 584 | 98 | 16.8% | −51.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 628 | 35 | 5.6% | −56.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 74 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 469 | 53 | 11.3% | −54.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.