Kawa'in
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as קוואעין )שבט( · קוואעין שבט
How Kawa'in voted in 2022
139 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 56.83% 79 votes |
+53.1 |
| עם Ra'am | 32.37% 45 votes |
+28.3 |
| מחל Likud | 6.47% 9 votes |
−16.9 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 0.72% 1 votes |
−10.1 |
| שס Shas | 0.72% 1 votes |
−7.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ד | בל"ד - אלתג`מוע אלווטני אלדמוקרטי בראשות סמי אבו ש | 1.44% | 2 | −1.5 |
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 1.44% | 2 | −1.7 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Kawa'in voted for בל"ד - אלתג`מוע אלווטני אלדמוקרטי בראשות סמי אבו ש. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.44% here, 0.5 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 2.91%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
139 voters out of 554 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Kawa'in against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Derig'at · Abu Tulul · Abu Juway'ad
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Derig'at | 428 |
| Abu Tulul | 647 |
| Abu Juway'ad | 540 |
| Abu Qureinat | 346 |
| Al-Hawashila | 624 |
| Sayyid | 321 |
| Kudayrat as-Sani' | 340 |
| Rummane | 614 |
10 elections in Kawa'in
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 554 | 139 | 25.1% | −45.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 517 | 118 | 22.8% | −44.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 489 | 118 | 24.1% | −47.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 475 | 94 | 19.8% | −50.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 472 | 65 | 13.8% | −54.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 413 | 309 | 74.8% | +2.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 366 | 93 | 25.4% | −42.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 274 | 35 | 12.8% | −49.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 137 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 308 | 140 | 45.5% | −20.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.