Ras Ali
How Ras Ali voted in 2003
135 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| עם הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת | 27.41% 37 votes |
+25.3 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 26.67% 36 votes |
−2.7 |
| ד בלי"ד (ברית לאומית דמוקרטית) | 25.93% 35 votes |
+23.7 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 13.33% 18 votes |
−1.1 |
| ו החזית הדמוקרטית לשלום ולשוויון (המפלגה הקומוניסטית הישראלית וחוגי ציבור יהודים וערבים) והתנועה הערבית להתחדשות | 2.96% 4 votes |
−0.0 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 0.74% 1 votes |
−3.5 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.74% 1 votes |
−3.5 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 0.74% 1 votes |
−11.5 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 0.74% 1 votes |
−4.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ט | מפלגת זכויות הגבר במשפחה - רעייש | 0.74% | 1 | +0.7 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
138 voters out of 211 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ras Ali against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ein Naqquba · Reihaniyye · Kafar Kama
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ein Naqquba | 384 |
| Reihaniyye | 403 |
| Kafar Kama | 667 |
| Abu Kuraynat | 488 |
| Hamam | 475 |
| Ghajar | 377 |
| Kamane | 358 |
| Nein | 532 |
10 elections in Ras Ali
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 444 | 238 | 53.6% | −17.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 424 | 184 | 43.4% | −24.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 406 | 286 | 70.4% | −1.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 401 | 239 | 59.6% | −10.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 390 | 158 | 40.5% | −27.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 328 | 205 | 62.5% | −9.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 302 | 179 | 59.3% | −8.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 269 | 164 | 61.0% | −1.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 196 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 211 | 138 | 65.4% | −0.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.