An-Nasasira
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as נצאצרה )שבט( · נצאצרה שבט
How An-Nasasira voted in 2009
56 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| עם הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת - התנועה הערבית להתחדשות | 89.29% 50 votes |
+85.9 |
| ד אלתג'מוע אלוטני אלדמוקרטי – בל"ד | 3.57% 2 votes |
+1.1 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 1.79% 1 votes |
−19.8 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 1.79% 1 votes |
−6.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 1.79% | 1 | +1.4 |
| רק | הירוקים – למען ישראל ירוקה | 1.79% | 1 | +1.4 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in An-Nasasira voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.79% here, 4.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.39%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
58 voters out of 246 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
An-Nasasira against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Rummane · Ibtin · Abu Rukayyek
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 15 times the number of valid votes).
| Rummane | 403 |
| Ibtin | 691 |
| Abu Rukayyek | 654 |
| Tamra (Yizre'el) | 504 |
| Kamane | 389 |
| Abu Rubay'a | 475 |
| Tayibe(Baemeq) | 614 |
| A'sam | 837 |
10 elections in An-Nasasira
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 345 | 140 | 40.6% | −30.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 337 | 118 | 35.0% | −32.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 320 | 177 | 55.3% | −16.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 320 | 150 | 46.9% | −23.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 319 | 93 | 29.2% | −39.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 349 | 152 | 43.6% | −28.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 313 | 247 | 78.9% | +11.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 246 | 58 | 23.6% | −38.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 29 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 236 | 86 | 36.4% | −29.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.