An-Nasasira
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as נצאצרה )שבט( · נצאצרה שבט
How An-Nasasira voted in 2013
243 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ד בל"ד - אלתג'מוע אלוותני אלדמוקרטי | 88.07% 214 votes |
+85.5 |
| עם הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת - התנועה הערבית להתחדשות – המפלגה העקבית הדמוקרטית | 5.35% 13 votes |
+1.7 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט - מיסודם של האיחוד הלאומי, המפד"ל החדשה | 4.94% 12 votes |
−4.2 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 0.82% 2 votes |
−7.9 |
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 0.41% 1 votes |
−22.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה לישראל בראשות אריה אלדד ומיכאל בן-ארי | 0.41% | 1 | −1.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
247 voters out of 313 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
An-Nasasira against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Abu Rukayyek · Qasr A-Sir · Sayyid
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Abu Rukayyek | 999 |
| Qasr A-Sir | 313 |
| Sayyid | 516 |
| Abu Rubay'a | 476 |
| Tuba-Zangariyye | 1,171 |
| Bir Hadage | 353 |
| Al-Hawashila | 447 |
| Umm Batin | 521 |
10 elections in An-Nasasira
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 345 | 140 | 40.6% | −30.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 337 | 118 | 35.0% | −32.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 320 | 177 | 55.3% | −16.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 320 | 150 | 46.9% | −23.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 319 | 93 | 29.2% | −39.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 349 | 152 | 43.6% | −28.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 313 | 247 | 78.9% | +11.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 246 | 58 | 23.6% | −38.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 29 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 236 | 86 | 36.4% | −29.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.