Giv'at Shappira
How Giv'at Shappira voted in 2003
81 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 37.04% 30 votes |
+22.6 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 30.86% 25 votes |
+18.6 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 14.81% 12 votes |
+9.6 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 13.58% 11 votes |
−15.8 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 1.23% 1 votes |
−3.0 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 1.23% 1 votes |
−4.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| רק | הירוקים | 1.23% | 1 | +0.8 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Giv'at Shappira voted for הירוקים. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.23% here, 3.0 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.41%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
82 voters out of 108 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Giv'at Shappira against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Yotvata · Ma'yan Zevi · Nir Yisra'el
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Yotvata | 344 |
| Ma'yan Zevi | 348 |
| Nir Yisra'el | 323 |
| Kinneret(Qevuza) | 400 |
| Atsmon Segev | 404 |
| Shoval | 327 |
| Kefar Masaryk | 382 |
| HaOgen | 375 |
10 elections in Giv'at Shappira
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 226 | 177 | 78.3% | +7.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 219 | 170 | 77.6% | +10.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 215 | 172 | 80.0% | +8.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 212 | 166 | 78.3% | +8.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 212 | 168 | 79.2% | +10.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 210 | 174 | 82.9% | +10.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 184 | 147 | 79.9% | +12.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 159 | 116 | 73.0% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 106 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 108 | 82 | 75.9% | +10.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.