Giv'at Shappira
How Giv'at Shappira voted in 2009
116 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 39.66% 46 votes |
+17.2 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 26.72% 31 votes |
+16.8 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 18.10% 21 votes |
−3.5 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 8.62% 10 votes |
+5.7 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 1.72% 2 votes |
−1.1 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.72% 2 votes |
−10.0 |
| ו חד"ש החזית הדמוקרטית לשלום ושיוויון (המפלגה הקומוניסטית הישראלית וחוגי ציבור ערבים ויהודים) | 0.86% 1 votes |
−2.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 1.72% | 2 | +0.9 |
| רק | הירוקים – למען ישראל ירוקה | 0.86% | 1 | +0.5 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Giv'at Shappira voted for התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.72% here, 2.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.82%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
116 voters out of 159 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Giv'at Shappira against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet Hanan · Dafna · En HaShofet
10 elections in Giv'at Shappira
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 226 | 177 | 78.3% | +7.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 219 | 170 | 77.6% | +10.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 215 | 172 | 80.0% | +8.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 212 | 166 | 78.3% | +8.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 212 | 168 | 79.2% | +10.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 210 | 174 | 82.9% | +10.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 184 | 147 | 79.9% | +12.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 159 | 116 | 73.0% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 106 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 108 | 82 | 75.9% | +10.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.