Tirosh
How Tirosh voted in 2003
194 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 41.75% 81 votes |
+33.5 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 38.66% 75 votes |
+9.3 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 7.73% 15 votes |
+3.5 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 3.61% 7 votes |
−0.7 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 1.55% 3 votes |
−12.9 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 1.55% 3 votes |
−4.0 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 0.52% 1 votes |
−11.8 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 0.52% 1 votes |
−2.2 |
| עם הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת | 0.52% 1 votes |
−1.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 5 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | זעם צדק חברתי | 1.03% | 2 | +1.0 |
| נץ | חרות | 1.03% | 2 | −0.1 |
| ט | מפלגת זכויות הגבר במשפחה - רעייש | 0.52% | 1 | +0.5 |
| צ | צומת | 0.52% | 1 | +0.5 |
| רק | הירוקים | 0.52% | 1 | +0.1 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Tirosh voted for זעם צדק חברתי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.03% here, 36.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.03%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
199 voters out of 254 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Tirosh against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Tirosh
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 336 | 268 | 79.8% | +9.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 332 | 227 | 68.4% | +0.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 331 | 252 | 76.1% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 332 | 245 | 73.8% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 333 | 237 | 71.2% | +2.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 306 | 218 | 71.2% | −1.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 301 | 199 | 66.1% | −1.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 276 | 179 | 64.9% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 180 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 254 | 199 | 78.3% | +12.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.