Tirosh
How Tirosh voted in 2022
268 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 40.30% 108 votes |
+16.9 |
| שס Shas | 38.43% 103 votes |
+30.2 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 13.81% 37 votes |
+3.0 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 3.36% 9 votes |
−2.5 |
| כן National Unity | 1.87% 5 votes |
−7.2 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 0.75% 2 votes |
−17.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 1.12% | 3 | −0.1 |
| קך | סדר חדש- למען האזרחים הותיקים בישראל | 0.37% | 1 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Tirosh voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.12% here, 0.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
268 voters out of 336 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Tirosh against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Shalwa · Avne Hefez · Ma'ale Amos
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Shalwa | 351 |
| Avne Hefez | 1,044 |
| Ma'ale Amos | 324 |
| Qiryat Netafim | 388 |
| Bne Dkalim | 625 |
| Ma'ale Levona | 351 |
| Mattityahu | 374 |
| Itamar | 492 |
10 elections in Tirosh
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 336 | 268 | 79.8% | +9.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 332 | 227 | 68.4% | +0.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 331 | 252 | 76.1% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 332 | 245 | 73.8% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 333 | 237 | 71.2% | +2.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 306 | 218 | 71.2% | −1.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 301 | 199 | 66.1% | −1.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 276 | 179 | 64.9% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 180 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 254 | 199 | 78.3% | +12.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.