Hever
How Hever voted in 2020
259 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 56.76% 147 votes |
+27.3 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 22.78% 59 votes |
−3.8 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 6.95% 18 votes |
−0.7 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 5.41% 14 votes |
−0.3 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 3.09% 8 votes |
−2.7 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 2.70% 7 votes |
−2.5 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.39% 1 votes |
−5.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 1.16% | 3 | +0.7 |
| נ | קול הנשים | 0.39% | 1 | +0.3 |
| ףז | הפיראטים לדמוקרטיה לחצו כאן | 0.39% | 1 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Hever voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.16% here, 2.7 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.42%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
259 voters out of 362 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Hever against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Qedar · Eshbol · Mishmar HaYarden
10 elections in Hever
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 501 | 362 | 72.3% | +1.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 409 | 287 | 70.2% | +2.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 362 | 259 | 71.5% | +0.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 345 | 250 | 72.5% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 348 | 232 | 66.7% | −1.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 235 | 169 | 71.9% | −0.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 220 | 145 | 65.9% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 215 | 134 | 62.3% | −0.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 94 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 152 | 115 | 75.7% | +10.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.