Hever
How Hever voted in 2022
361 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 43.77% 158 votes |
+20.4 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 13.85% 50 votes |
+3.0 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 12.74% 46 votes |
−5.0 |
| כן National Unity | 12.47% 45 votes |
+3.4 |
| שס Shas | 8.59% 31 votes |
+0.3 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 3.60% 13 votes |
−0.9 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 2.77% 10 votes |
−0.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| אצ | חופש כלכלי בראשות אביר קארה | 0.83% | 3 | +0.5 |
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 0.55% | 2 | −2.6 |
| קץ | באומץ בשבילך | 0.55% | 2 | +0.2 |
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 0.28% | 1 | −0.9 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
362 voters out of 501 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Hever against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Hulda · Sede Eliyyahu · Zurit
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Hulda | 552 |
| Sede Eliyyahu | 396 |
| Zurit | 561 |
| Benaya | 484 |
| Kinneret(Qevuza) | 424 |
| Ruhama | 366 |
| Afeq | 416 |
| Bet Lehem HaGelilit | 449 |
10 elections in Hever
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 501 | 362 | 72.3% | +1.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 409 | 287 | 70.2% | +2.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 362 | 259 | 71.5% | +0.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 345 | 250 | 72.5% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 348 | 232 | 66.7% | −1.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 235 | 169 | 71.9% | −0.4 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 220 | 145 | 65.9% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 215 | 134 | 62.3% | −0.2 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 94 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 152 | 115 | 75.7% | +10.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.