Alumim
How Alumim voted in 2009
233 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 50.21% 117 votes |
+47.3 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 29.18% 68 votes |
+7.6 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 9.87% 23 votes |
+6.5 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 3.43% 8 votes |
−19.0 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 2.15% 5 votes |
−7.8 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 0.43% 1 votes |
−4.0 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.43% 1 votes |
−11.3 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 0.43% 1 votes |
−8.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 3.43% | 8 | +2.6 |
| חי | ישראל חזקה בראשות ד"ר אפרים סנה | 0.43% | 1 | +0.2 |
What happened to these votes
8 people in Alumim voted for התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.43% here, 4.2 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.82%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
233 voters out of 304 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Alumim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Nehalim · Bene Re'em · Elyaqim
10 elections in Alumim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 347 | 249 | 71.8% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 359 | 268 | 74.7% | +7.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 346 | 265 | 76.6% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 349 | 264 | 75.6% | +5.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 346 | 278 | 80.3% | +11.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 345 | 262 | 75.9% | +3.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 318 | 268 | 84.3% | +16.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 304 | 233 | 76.6% | +14.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 219 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 268 | 209 | 78.0% | +12.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.