Alumim
How Alumim voted in 2021
268 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 60.07% 161 votes |
+53.9 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 12.31% 33 votes |
−11.9 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 6.72% 18 votes |
+2.0 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 5.60% 15 votes |
−1.0 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 5.22% 14 votes |
−0.9 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 4.48% 12 votes |
−9.4 |
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 3.73% 10 votes |
−1.4 |
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 0.75% 2 votes |
−3.8 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 0.37% 1 votes |
−5.3 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.37% 1 votes |
−6.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כ | הלב היהודי בראשות אלי יוסף | 0.37% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
268 voters out of 359 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Alumim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Sede Uzziyyahu · Dolev · Zekharya
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Sede Uzziyyahu | 759 |
| Dolev | 687 |
| Zekharya | 578 |
| Ben Zakkay | 482 |
| Bet Shiqma | 389 |
| Azarya | 632 |
| Yad Rambam | 619 |
| Kefar Hoshen | 410 |
10 elections in Alumim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 347 | 249 | 71.8% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 359 | 268 | 74.7% | +7.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 346 | 265 | 76.6% | +5.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 349 | 264 | 75.6% | +5.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 346 | 278 | 80.3% | +11.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 345 | 262 | 75.9% | +3.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 318 | 268 | 84.3% | +16.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 304 | 233 | 76.6% | +14.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 219 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 268 | 209 | 78.0% | +12.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.