Netu'a
How Netu'a voted in 2015
181 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 31.49% 57 votes |
+8.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 22.10% 40 votes |
+16.4 |
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 16.57% 30 votes |
−2.1 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 14.92% 27 votes |
+7.4 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 4.42% 8 votes |
−2.3 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 4.42% 8 votes |
−4.4 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 1.10% 2 votes |
−3.9 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 1.10% 2 votes |
−2.8 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.55% 1 votes |
−4.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 1.66% | 3 | +0.5 |
| קץ | יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי | 1.10% | 2 | −1.9 |
| ףץ | Unsourced | 0.55% | 1 | +0.5 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Netu'a voted for עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.66% here, 1.5 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.12%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
182 voters out of 223 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Netu'a against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Azarya · Yad Rambam · Avdon
10 elections in Netu'a
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 257 | 193 | 75.1% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 241 | 177 | 73.4% | +6.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 243 | 185 | 76.1% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 242 | 183 | 75.6% | +5.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 240 | 184 | 76.7% | +8.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 223 | 182 | 81.6% | +9.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 228 | 154 | 67.5% | −0.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 210 | 148 | 70.5% | +8.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 144 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 214 | 140 | 65.4% | −0.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.