Netu'a
How Netu'a voted in 2003
137 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 51.09% 70 votes |
+21.7 |
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 15.33% 21 votes |
+7.1 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 14.60% 20 votes |
+0.1 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 4.38% 6 votes |
−1.1 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 3.65% 5 votes |
−0.6 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 2.92% 4 votes |
−1.3 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 2.92% 4 votes |
+0.2 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 2.19% 3 votes |
−10.1 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 1.46% 2 votes |
−3.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.73% | 1 | −0.5 |
| רק | הירוקים | 0.73% | 1 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
140 voters out of 214 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Netu'a against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Nili · Bet El'azari · עופרים
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Nili | 367 |
| Bet El'azari | 464 |
| עופרים | 347 |
| Elishama | 416 |
| Megadim | 362 |
| Bet Nehemya | 309 |
| Almon | 327 |
| Massu'ot Yizhaq | 329 |
10 elections in Netu'a
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 257 | 193 | 75.1% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 241 | 177 | 73.4% | +6.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 243 | 185 | 76.1% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 242 | 183 | 75.6% | +5.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 240 | 184 | 76.7% | +8.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 223 | 182 | 81.6% | +9.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 228 | 154 | 67.5% | −0.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 210 | 148 | 70.5% | +8.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 144 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 214 | 140 | 65.4% | −0.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.