Zofar
How Zofar voted in 2013
215 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 25.12% 54 votes |
+10.8 |
| כן הישראלים | 20.47% 44 votes |
+18.4 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות שלי יחימוביץ' | 16.28% 35 votes |
+4.9 |
| מרץ מרצ - השמאל של ישראל | 11.16% 24 votes |
+6.6 |
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 10.23% 22 votes |
−13.1 |
| צפ התנועה בראשות ציפי לבני | 9.77% 21 votes |
+4.8 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט - מיסודם של האיחוד הלאומי, המפד"ל החדשה | 4.19% 9 votes |
−4.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | ארץ חדשה – החזית להפלת שלטון ההון בראשות אלדד יניב ורני בלייר | 0.93% | 2 | +0.2 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - הרשימה הליברלית | 0.93% | 2 | −0.2 |
| נץ | עוצמה לישראל בראשות אריה אלדד ומיכאל בן-ארי | 0.47% | 1 | −1.3 |
| ץ | עם שלם - בהכוונת הרב חיים אמסלם | 0.47% | 1 | −0.7 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
217 voters out of 281 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Zofar against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Maggal · Ashdot Ya'aqov(Ihud) · Bahan
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Maggal | 571 |
| Ashdot Ya'aqov(Ihud) | 377 |
| Bahan | 351 |
| Lohame HaGeta'ot | 329 |
| Sa'ad | 470 |
| HaHoterim | 371 |
| Kokhav Mikha'el | 461 |
| Yoqne'am(Moshava) | 739 |
10 elections in Zofar
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 383 | 251 | 65.5% | −5.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 361 | 231 | 64.0% | −3.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 352 | 267 | 75.9% | +4.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 341 | 246 | 72.1% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 334 | 255 | 76.3% | +7.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 312 | 248 | 79.5% | +7.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 281 | 217 | 77.2% | +9.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 290 | 220 | 75.9% | +13.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 181 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 172 | 131 | 76.2% | +10.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.