Zofar
How Zofar voted in 2021
230 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 34.78% 80 votes |
+28.2 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 19.13% 44 votes |
+5.2 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 18.70% 43 votes |
+12.6 |
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 9.57% 22 votes |
+5.0 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 6.09% 14 votes |
−18.1 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 5.22% 12 votes |
+0.5 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 3.48% 8 votes |
−2.7 |
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 2.17% 5 votes |
−2.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.87% | 2 | +0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
231 voters out of 361 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Zofar against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Masaryk · Gan Shelomo · Gal'on
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Masaryk | 426 |
| Gan Shelomo | 331 |
| Gal'on | 326 |
| Allonim | 396 |
| Nezer Sereni | 502 |
| Hadar Am | 409 |
| Elon | 612 |
| Kefar Vitkin | 1,059 |
10 elections in Zofar
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 383 | 251 | 65.5% | −5.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 361 | 231 | 64.0% | −3.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 352 | 267 | 75.9% | +4.3 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 341 | 246 | 72.1% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 334 | 255 | 76.3% | +7.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 312 | 248 | 79.5% | +7.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 281 | 217 | 77.2% | +9.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 290 | 220 | 75.9% | +13.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 181 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 172 | 131 | 76.2% | +10.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.