Yahel
How Yahel voted in 2003
74 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 35.14% 26 votes |
+20.7 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 25.68% 19 votes |
−3.7 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 18.92% 14 votes |
+6.6 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 13.51% 10 votes |
+8.3 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 2.70% 2 votes |
−2.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 4.05% | 3 | +2.9 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Yahel voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.05% here, 3.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
74 voters out of 148 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Yahel against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Blum · Ma'oz Hayyim · Midreshet Ben Gurion
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Blum | 349 |
| Ma'oz Hayyim | 323 |
| Midreshet Ben Gurion | 318 |
| Ma'anit | 329 |
| Kefar Szold | 309 |
| Ramat HaShofet | 320 |
| Bet Lehem HaGelilit | 312 |
| Allonim | 346 |
10 elections in Yahel
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 224 | 132 | 58.9% | −11.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 218 | 132 | 60.6% | −6.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 217 | 121 | 55.8% | −15.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 218 | 128 | 58.7% | −11.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 214 | 118 | 55.1% | −13.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 204 | 102 | 50.0% | −22.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 217 | 108 | 49.8% | −18.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 193 | 92 | 47.7% | −14.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 82 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 148 | 74 | 50.0% | −15.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.