Yahel
How Yahel voted in 2020
120 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 53.33% 64 votes |
+26.7 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 23.33% 28 votes |
+17.5 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 15.00% 18 votes |
−14.5 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.33% 4 votes |
−2.4 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.83% 1 votes |
−11.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נק | מתקדמת (בשיתוף עם תנועת הדרור העברי) | 4.17% | 5 | +4.2 |
What happened to these votes
5 people in Yahel voted for מתקדמת (בשיתוף עם תנועת הדרור העברי). None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.17% here, 307.5 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.01%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
121 voters out of 217 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Yahel against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Magen · Ein Al-Asad · Shoval
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Magen | 333 |
| Ein Al-Asad | 343 |
| Shoval | 451 |
| Yaqum | 424 |
| Sede Yo'av | 308 |
| Amir | 348 |
| Gazit | 450 |
| Bet HaEmeq | 337 |
10 elections in Yahel
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 224 | 132 | 58.9% | −11.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 218 | 132 | 60.6% | −6.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 217 | 121 | 55.8% | −15.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 218 | 128 | 58.7% | −11.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 214 | 118 | 55.1% | −13.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 204 | 102 | 50.0% | −22.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 217 | 108 | 49.8% | −18.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 193 | 92 | 47.7% | −14.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 82 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 148 | 74 | 50.0% | −15.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.