Telalim
How Telalim voted in 2019
219 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 49.32% 108 votes |
+23.4 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 17.81% 39 votes |
+13.0 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 14.61% 32 votes |
−10.5 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 8.68% 19 votes |
+4.3 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 4.57% 10 votes |
−1.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.20% 7 votes |
−3.8 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 1.37% 3 votes |
−6.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 0.46% | 1 | +0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
219 voters out of 322 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Telalim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Sede Nehemya · Kinneret(Qevuza) · Yehi'am
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Sede Nehemya | 575 |
| Kinneret(Qevuza) | 439 |
| Yehi'am | 365 |
| Ashdot Ya'aqov(Ihud) | 476 |
| Misgav Dov | 387 |
| Bahan | 448 |
| Mishmar HaNegev | 523 |
| Kefar Bialik | 360 |
9 elections in Telalim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 455 | 312 | 68.6% | −2.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 355 | 235 | 66.2% | −1.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 330 | 234 | 70.9% | −0.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 322 | 219 | 68.0% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 311 | 225 | 72.3% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 181 | 143 | 79.0% | +6.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 109 | 82 | 75.2% | +7.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 142 | 93 | 65.5% | +3.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 66 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.